Asus ROG Telephone 6 models put to test - which one is the quickest?
Presentation
----
We've as of late audited both the ROG Telephone 6 Expert and the ROG Telephone 6D Extreme. As you would definitely be aware, the previous of the two is based around Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, while the last option utilizes a tuned variant of MediaTek's Dimensity 9000+ chipset. The ROG Telephone 6D Extreme likewise has the interesting Asus AeroActive Entry on its back - a functioning air conduit with dainty warm blades and an immediate pathway into the inner cooling of the telephone. It is a charming piece of equipment that we previously tried in our 6D Extreme survey.
Today, we direct our concentration toward the vanilla ROG Telephone 6D - the non-Extreme model. Very much like its 6D Extreme kin, it depends on the Dimensity 9000+ chipset. In contrast to it, in any case, it comes up short on AeroActive entryway, and that actually intends that, at any rate, there are some warm administration contrasts between the two. Since this and the shortfall of a ROG Vision show on the rear of the ROG Telephone 6D are the main distinctions to note between the vanilla and A definitive, we will not be doing a full survey. It would be bright repetitive, most definitely. What we will do, in any case, is benchmarking the ROG Telephone 6D and testing its warm choking conduct to perceive how it analyzes to its kin, which would address the subject of which is the best-performing ROG Telephone 6.
Engineered benchmarks
-----
Before we get into benchmark numbers, some extra data is all together. The ROG Telephone 6D unit we have for testing is the extraordinary Batman version. Very much like its Definitive kin, it has a basically overclocked MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ chipset. Clients get a solitary essential Cortex-X2 center, timed at up to 3.35 GHz rather than the default 3.2 GHz. The three Cortex-A710 centers are additionally overclocked to 3.20 GHz rather than their default 2.85 GHz. The excess four "little" Cortex-A510 centers are left at their default 1.8 GHz, which checks out perceiving how they are intended for effectiveness rather than execution.
As far as GPU, the ROG Telephone 6D and 6D Extreme are both shaking the Mali-G710 MC10 without any notice of an overclock of any kind. The chipset is matched with 256GB of UFS 3.1 capacity and up to 16GB of Slam, which sounds sort of odd from the outset, given the ROG Telephone 6 Genius presents to 18GB of Smash. In any case, the ROG Telephone 6D and 6D Extreme utilize the more up to date LPDDR5X Slam, which right now just goes to 16GB modules, which makes sense of the choice. Our specific Batman unit, nonetheless, isn't the most elevated level model, so it has 12GB of Smash available to its.
We'll be quick to concede that benchmark scores from the ROG Telephone 6D are unsurprising, yet we will not hear us whine about consistency contrasted with the ROG Telephone 6D Extreme.
Computer chip execution from the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ is obviously better compared to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 inside the ROG Telephone 6 Ace - particularly in the multi-center test, where the previous got over 30% better execution in the default Dynamic mode.
In the single-center piece of the test, the ROG Telephone 6 Ace started to lead the pack until X-Mode was enacted. Clearly, Asus has figured out how to tune the X-Mode on the Dimensity 9000+ quite well.
---
AnTuTu appears to offer somewhat to a greater degree a "spread" in scores from the get go, however when you get down to it, the changes are still well inside the wiggle room from one hurry to another, and the ROG Telephone 6D and 6D Extreme exchange blows the three unique modes. The ROG Telephone 6 scores shockingly low in the default Dynamic mode yet recovers its stand once X Mode is locked in.
Obviously, the 12GB of Smash in the ROG Telephone 6D didn't end up being a significant burden in AnTuTu.
----
Continuing on toward graphical benchmarks, we track down one more cluster of reliably comparable scores. Once more, the ROG Telephone 6 scores at the lower part of both GFX Aztek tests yet it refocuses when X Mode is enacted.
----
As we move lower in the benchmark stack, we get to less troublesome tests that utilization more established graphical Programming interface adaptations. It's here that we notice that the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1-fueled ROG Telephone 6 Star scores higher than its MediaTek kin.
The distinctions are not really huge, yet it appears as though Qualcomm's chip is better enhanced for more seasoned OpenGL ES adaptations, for what that is worth.
Anyway, we are rapidly beginning to get numbers well more than 100 fps, which is difficult to grumble about in these engineered and ridiculously troublesome burdens. Any cutting edge game motor will be much more adaptable with regards to its delivering to guarantee high casing rates.
Furthermore, it barely comes as a shock that what are seemingly some of, on the off chance that not exactly ideal, gaming telephones as of now around can deliver a ton of casings and bite through essentially any undertaking you toss at them.
At last, the 3DMark Untamed life Outrageous test lays out similar picture as the last two tests - giving the sign of approval for the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.
-----
However, perhaps the greatest amazement in this similar test was that with regards to warm choking conduct, the vanilla 6D performed better or similarly great as the ROG Telephone 6D Extreme in every one of the three presentation modes. That, yet it stood its ground against the 6 Ace.
Nonetheless, it appears to be that the Mediatek chips are more inclined to warming than the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 when pushed more diligently as the Snapdragon chipset maintained an even-mind in the GPU Stress test.
Decision
As we arrive at the finish of this near test, now is the ideal time to concoct a decision. In the event that we needed to pick a solitary gadget out of the three, we'd suggest getting the vanilla ROG Telephone 6D. It just comes in 12GB/256GB design however we didn't view the 12GB Smash as a bottleneck in any of the benchmarks. It likewise doesn't have a screen on its back, however the ROG Telephone 6 Ace and 6D Extreme will cost you around 30% more without giving any significant expansion in execution.
The two 6D models are still on pre-request, yet in the event that you are not in that frame of mind with your buy, we'd say the ROG Telephone 6D is the least expensive and most reasonable passage in the ROG Telephone 6 series.
